Chris Evert
Pete Sampras
Stat by stat
Bars are scaled to the leader in this list.
The verdict
Dead even across the measured categories. Our all-time ranking places Chris Evert at #9 and Pete Sampras at #11.
Head-to-head FAQ
Who leads more shared metrics?
How do the published ranks compare?
Are these live stats?
The case for Chris Evert
Evert set standards of consistency that still look unreal. Her career winning percentage of roughly 90 percent — about 1,309 wins against 146 losses — is the highest of the Open Era for either sex, and on clay she won 125 consecutive matches between 1973 and 1979, the longest single-surface streak in the sport's history alongside Nadal's. She reached the semifinals or better at 34 consecutive Grand Slams she entered, and won at least one major every year for 13 straight seasons, from 1974 to 1986, finishing with 18. A pioneer of the two-handed backhand and the ice-cool baseline precision that earned her the nickname the Ice Maiden, she spent 260 weeks at No.1 and captured a then-record seven Roland Garros titles. Her 80-match rivalry with Martina Navratilova, which she trailed 37-43, dragged both women to greater heights and defined the women's game for over a decade. Peak dominance and unmatched reliability place her comfortably inside the all-time top ten.
The case for Pete Sampras
Sampras retired with what was then the men's all-time record of 14 majors, and the record most likely to survive the Big Three era is still his: six consecutive year-end No.1 finishes, 1993 through 1998, a run of sustained supremacy no man has matched before or since. His seven Wimbledon titles in eight years (1993-2000) were built on the most complete serving game the sport had seen — not the fastest serve, but the best-disguised, backed by a second serve routinely rated the greatest ever and an attacking all-court game that made him nearly unbreakable on fast surfaces. He spent 286 weeks at No.1, won 64 titles, and ended his career with a perfect exit: winning the 2002 US Open, beating Agassi in the final, and never playing another match. The gap in his record — no Roland Garros, with just one semifinal there — is why he sits near the bottom of this list rather than the middle; on everything but clay, he was the standard his successors chased.