Martina Navratilova
Pete Sampras
Stat by stat
Bars are scaled to the leader in this list.
The verdict
Martina Navratilova leads 2 of 2 categories. Our all-time ranking places Martina Navratilova at #7 and Pete Sampras at #11.
Head-to-head FAQ
Who leads more shared metrics?
How do the published ranks compare?
Are these live stats?
The case for Martina Navratilova
Navratilova rewrote what a tennis career could contain. Her 167 singles titles are the most by any player in the Open Era, man or woman; add 177 doubles titles and 59 total Grand Slam trophies (18 singles, 31 women's doubles, 10 mixed) and she is the most decorated champion in the sport's history. Her peak was the most dominant sustained stretch ever played: 86-1 in 1983, a 74-match winning streak in 1984 that remains the Open Era record, six consecutive majors across 1983-84, and 331 total weeks at No.1. Her record 9 Wimbledon singles titles included six in a row. Beyond the numbers, she changed the sport's methods — the first champion built on modern strength training, nutrition and sports science, a full decade before it became standard — and her 80-match rivalry with Chris Evert (43-37 Navratilova) is the longest great rivalry tennis has produced. She won her last major, mixed doubles at the 2006 US Open, at age 49.
The case for Pete Sampras
Sampras retired with what was then the men's all-time record of 14 majors, and the record most likely to survive the Big Three era is still his: six consecutive year-end No.1 finishes, 1993 through 1998, a run of sustained supremacy no man has matched before or since. His seven Wimbledon titles in eight years (1993-2000) were built on the most complete serving game the sport had seen — not the fastest serve, but the best-disguised, backed by a second serve routinely rated the greatest ever and an attacking all-court game that made him nearly unbreakable on fast surfaces. He spent 286 weeks at No.1, won 64 titles, and ended his career with a perfect exit: winning the 2002 US Open, beating Agassi in the final, and never playing another match. The gap in his record — no Roland Garros, with just one semifinal there — is why he sits near the bottom of this list rather than the middle; on everything but clay, he was the standard his successors chased.