Babe Ruth
Hank Aaron
Stat by stat
Bars are scaled to the leader in this list.
The verdict
Dead even across the measured categories. Our all-time ranking places Babe Ruth at #1 and Hank Aaron at #4.
Head-to-head FAQ
Who leads more shared metrics?
How do the published ranks compare?
Are these live stats?
The case for Babe Ruth
The gap between Ruth and his contemporaries remains the largest any team-sport athlete has opened. His 182.6 career WAR leads all players, and the shape of it is absurd: before becoming a full-time hitter he went 94-46 as a pitcher with a 2.28 ERA, led the AL with a 1.75 ERA in 1916, and threw nearly 30 consecutive scoreless World Series innings. Then he invented modern offense. His 54 home runs in 1920 exceeded the total of every other American League team; his 60 in 1927 out-homered each AL rival again. His career .342 average, .474 on-base percentage, and 1.164 OPS — still the all-time record — came with a slugging percentage (.690) no qualified career has matched. He faced a segregated talent pool, which the debate must acknowledge, but dominance relative to environment is the fairest cross-era test, and by that test Ruth has no peer.
The case for Hank Aaron
Aaron is the sport's monument to sustained excellence. He never hit 50 home runs in a season, yet finished with 755 — breaking Ruth's record on April 8, 1974, while receiving nearly a million pieces of mail, much of it death threats — and he remains the all-time leader in RBI (2,297) and total bases (6,856, a full 722 ahead of second place). He hit .305 for a quarter century, collected 3,771 hits, made a record 25 All-Star selections, and posted 15 seasons of 30-plus homers. Remove all 755 home runs from his record and he would still have more than 3,000 hits. Aaron's 143.1 WAR understates the difficulty of his context: he began in the Negro Leagues with the Indianapolis Clowns in 1952 and produced his greatest seasons through the pitching-dominant 1960s in Milwaukee and Atlanta, far from the media capitals that minted legends.