Skip to content Skip to a section
T Tank

Campaigns

How Tank unfolded as historical sequence, not instruction.

Educational history. Casualty figures are documented ranges. This is not operational advice, a ranking of nations, or a how-to for weapons or coups.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

Are the scores a ranking of nations or armies?

No. Scores are browsing aids inside an era-bounded atlas — not live league tables of countries.

Who "invented" it?

A British committee (Swinton, Tritton, Wilson and others) and parallel French work. There is no single Edison. The cover name came from industrial disguise.

Did tanks win the First World War?

They helped in 1918 combined arms. They did not win alone. Mechanical failure was common in 1916-17.

What is an MBT?

A Cold War idea that one "main" tank should replace light/medium/heavy splits. Centurion and T-54 are early exhibits.

Are tanks obsolete?

A headline since 1918, 1973, and the 2020s. History shows adaptation, not a funeral -- and this page will not umpire a current war.

How does Korea fit?

T-34s in 1950; then a ROK armour force and K1/K2 industry. See also the ROK military and Hanwha pages.

Start with this section - Campaigns

Cambrai, 1940, Kursk, Sinai 1973, Korea 1950 -- dated uses, not a campaign school.

Combined arms is the repeated historical sentence.

Principles

1916 debut

A type is born.

FT layout

A century's silhouette.

1973 missile shock

A staff-college date.

MBT

Cold War "one main type" idea. Read as a 1916-present (as a type) concept in From the Somme to every later armoured front.

ATGM

Missiles that recast 1973 staff talk -- named, not instructed. Not a present instruction.

Steps

  1. Flers-Courcelette

    1916-09-15: Mark I debut.

    A dated type-history beat of Tank (1916-present (as a type)). No employment, arming, or build steps.

  2. Cambrai

    1917-11: First massed British tank attack; gains then lost.

    A dated type-history beat of Tank (1916-present (as a type)). No employment, arming, or build steps.

  3. FT and 1918 battles

    1918: Turret layout; combined arms.

    A dated type-history beat of Tank (1916-present (as a type)). No employment, arming, or build steps.

  4. Doctrine fights

    1930s: Fuller, Guderian, Tukhachevsky.

    A dated type-history beat of Tank (1916-present (as a type)). No employment, arming, or build steps.

  5. Early WWII

    1939-41: The type's political shock in Europe.

    A dated type-history beat of Tank (1916-present (as a type)). No employment, arming, or build steps.

  6. Kursk caption

    1943: Density and myth.

    A dated type-history beat of Tank (1916-present (as a type)). No employment, arming, or build steps.

Diagrams

Tank: 1916-09-15 to 2000s-20s
People around Tank

Limits

Source limits

Figures such as "not a war -- a system; human cost is in the wars that used it" stay in ranges because records are incomplete, political, or still closed. Who "invented" it? is answered as a band.

No how-to

Tank is systems history and employment as a past fact. This page does not teach manufacturing, arming, aiming, or attack procedures.

Memory bias

English-language fame of Tank and local memory in From the Somme to every later armoured front are not the same map. Gotthard Heinrici / etc. -- skip; use a Korean is often the correction the first photograph drops.

Manoeuvre stories are descriptions of past wars.

This is not an employment guide.

HistoryForcesCampaignsCostIconsLegacyAtlas