Skip to content Skip to a section
⚓ Sinking of MV Sewol

Sewol evidence: AIS, cargo and the hull

Track data, rebuild papers, announcements and the 2017 raised hull that supported the crew convictions.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

When did MV Sewol sink?

The ferry listed and capsized on the morning of 16 April 2014 in the Yellow Sea near Jindo, on the Incheon–Jeju route. It had left Incheon the previous night.

How many people died?

Korean official accounting used in the trials is 304 dead or missing out of 476 aboard, with 172 rescued. About 250 of the dead were Danwon High School students. Early search tallies of recovered bodies and still-missing persons shifted by single digits as the salvage continued.

Who was convicted?

Captain Lee Joon-seok received a life sentence, upheld by the Supreme Court on 12 November 2015, for homicide by wilful negligence and related counts. Other crew received terms from about 18 months to 12 years on the final appeal path. Some Coast Guard and regulatory officials were separately convicted or dismissed.

What caused the capsize?

Courts and investigation bodies pointed to a combination of a sharp turn, excess and poorly secured cargo, reduced stability after rebuilding, and insufficient ballast — not a wartime act and not a single unexplained hole.

Why did passengers stay inside?

Repeated announcements told them to wait. The captain did not issue a timely abandon-ship order. The Supreme Court treated that omission, plus the crew’s departure, as the core of the homicide-by-wilful-negligence finding.

When was the ship raised?

The hull was brought up on 23 March 2017 and later moved for examination and memorial use. Salvage was meant to recover remaining missing people and to preserve the ship as evidence.

2014Yellow Sea, South Koreaconvicted

The criminal file is rich: track, cargo, audio and a recovered ship.

What is thinner is a single agreed minute-by-minute of the first Coast Guard decisions.

Exhibits

Exhibit A

AIS and voyage data

Physical

Track and turn data fix the morning manoeuvre in the Maenggol Channel and the growing list.

Exhibit B

Rebuild and stability papers

Document

Conversion drawings and stability calculations were compared with the ship as sailed. Investigators treated the 2012–13 rebuild as a cause, not a backdrop.

Exhibit C

Cargo and ballast records

Document

Overload and under-ballast findings supported the conclusion that the turn could not be recovered.

Exhibit D

Cabin announcements

Testimony

Survivors and recovered audio established the stay-put instructions that the Supreme Court treated as decisive.

Exhibit E

Raised hull, 2017

Wreck

The intact-enough hull allowed a delayed interior survey and a search for the still missing.

Exhibit F

Gwangju and Supreme Court opinions

Inquiry

The 2015 appellate and final judgments are the legal statement of homicide by wilful negligence.

How strong is the record?

Crew-conduct record
90

Departure without evacuation is densely evidenced and fully tried.

Stability and cargo file
82

Rebuild and load findings are consistent across investigation bodies.

Rescue-command timeline
68

Who could have entered the hull, and when, remains more contested than the capsize physics.

Owner-network paper
60

Chonghaejin’s group structure was partly mapped; Yoo’s death cut a criminal thread.

Evidence was sufficient for a life sentence. It was not sufficient to end argument about the state.

Public-record encyclopedia. Not legal advice. Not a how-to. Graphic detail is withheld. Wars belong in a separate atlas.

Related cases