Skip to content Skip to a section
Strategic talent

Signs

How strategic talent is noticed without over-labelling — cues, tests and false positives.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

Does this atlas rank groups by IQ, race or nation?

No. Pathways and evidence stay individual. Scores are browsing aids — never group biological or racial ranks.

What did de Groot find?

Masters did not always search deeper in simple measures; they saw better positions. Perception as expertise.

How much does practice explain in games?

Macnamara et al. 2014: about 26% in their games coding — minority, largest among their bands.

Were the Polgárs a proof of nurture?

László Polgár’s project produced three elite players, including Judit. It is a powerful family experiment, not a proof that any child can be world number one.

Is go the same file as chess?

Shared search and pattern; different aesthetics and institutions (Japan/Korea/China houses).

Does chess make you smarter at life?

Near transfer to similar search tasks is likelier than far transfer to every decision. “Chess in schools raises IQ” is a weaker claim.

Start with this section - Signs

Signs of strategic talent are cues for curiosity, not a diagnosis and not a caste stamp.

Tests measure a sample already shaped by teaching and invitation. False positives are part of the identification problem.

Early cues

Tests & tasks

Environments

False positives

Strategic talent: a cue is information. A label without a review date is a caste.

OriginsScienceSignsDevelopPracticeExemplarsMyths In this language region