Skip to content Skip to a section

🦢Conservation pressure

Crane · Tall wetland dancers whose red-crowned East Asian population is the atlas type and a conservation bottleneck.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

Why does this atlas use the red-crowned crane?

The taxonomy hero is Grus japonensis -- Kushiro, the Korean DMZ and Izumi. Other Grus species appear as comparison, not as the page type.

How close did whooping cranes come to zero?

The Aransas-Wood Buffalo flock was about 21 birds in 1941. That nadir still defines US recovery graphs.

What did George Archibald do at ICF?

He courtship-danced with a human-imprinted whooping crane named Tex so she would ovulate -- a 1980s method story, not a field census.

Why is Izumi a single-point risk?

A large share of the migratory island population winters on one Kyushu floodplain. Influenza years there are species-level events.

Do cranes mate with a lifelong dance?

Pairs are typically socially monogamous. The dance is pair-bond and territorial display, not a fairy-tale wedding.

What is the Korean DMZ crane role?

Wintering red-crowned and white-naped cranes use the Civilian Control Zone. Peace-time development is a documented risk to that accidental reserve.

IUCN: Endangered

The crane future is a triad of climate, take and attention -- not a product roadmap.

Risk scores here track conservation pressure relative to other types. High resilience types sit in a calmer band; CR/EN types do not.

Conservation risk

74 / 100
threatened

Crane sits in a threatened band in this atlas (resilience 36/100). Red-crowned crane is Endangered; whooping crane remains one of the rarest North American recoveries.

Teaching snapshot as of September 2026 — not a live IUCN feed.

Safeguards

Listing and enforcement

CITES, ESA, RFMOs and national parks only work when patrols and papers move.

Site protection

A breeding lake, ice type or cavity tree cannot be replaced by a logo.

Prey and forage base

Seals, krill, ungulates, bamboo and sardines are the quiet half of the crane budget.

Disease and toxin watch

Ebola, KHV, TTX, lead and rodenticides are type-specific ceilings.

English-language science capacity

The field sites in the techDeep lens still train the next census -- they are a safeguard only if funded.

What monitoring automates first

Census and acoustics

Camera traps, radar and moorings already take hours that used to be only notebooks.

Trade-document checks

eBCD and permit databases can flag a loin or a skin faster than a paper file.

Outbreak mapping

Flu and Ebola desks now run on shared dashboards -- still needing a human closer.

Visitor flow

Ticketing and hide cameras can be scheduled; habituation ethics cannot be fully automated.

Structural shifts

Climate as habitat law

Ice, bleach and river heat are now listing factors, not background weather.

From fortress to corridor

National parks plus gene flow -- panda belts, tiger landscapes, wolf packs on roads.

Fame as a take risk

Nemo, Jaws, Koko and Cecil still move capture, fear and donations in the same year.

English science is not the range

The localLens is a reading aid. Range-state languages still hold the living animal.

Outlook

Near term

Expect more listings, more cameras and more conflict paperwork -- not a sudden best-species ending.

Medium term

Sites that keep forage and enforcement will hold; single-lake and single-forest types stay brittle.

Long view

The crane body plan will remain recognisable. The map of secure versus threatened populations will not.

Keep exploring

More in Birds