Skip to content Skip to a section

🦁Conservation pressure

Lion · A social pantherine whose prides, Gir relic and 2015 Cecil killing still structure African conservation politics.

At a glance
Score intensity

Darker cells mean a higher score for this topic on that metric.

Last reviewed Sources & creditsMedia creditsMethodology

Quick answers

Why is the lion scored below the tiger on ecological role but above on culture?

Lions structure some savanna systems; elephants and wolves outrank both as engineers or keystones in this atlas. Culture is flags, churches and film -- lions win that axis. Scores stay relative across 24 types.

What is different about Gir lions?

Asiatic lions are a single-forest population with a distinctive belly fold and a thinner mane. A disease or fire there is a subspecies event.

Did Cecil change hunting policy?

The 2015 Hwange killing spiked petitions and some airline trophy bans. Zimbabwe and US Fish and Wildlife arguments did not end trophy hunting as a system.

Are lions recovering like some wolves?

No. Most African populations are still in long decline outside a few well-funded parks. VU is not a rebound band.

What did Born Free fix in the public mind?

Elsa the lioness (1960 book, 1966 film) made rehabilitation a children story. Field lion work is pride demography and conflict, not a single tame cat.

Who runs the Serengeti numbers?

The Serengeti Lion Project (Packer and successors) produced the long pride dataset that textbooks still mine.

IUCN: Vulnerable

The lion future is a triad of climate, take and attention -- not a product roadmap.

Risk scores here track conservation pressure relative to other types. High resilience types sit in a calmer band; CR/EN types do not.

Conservation risk

81 / 100
threatened

Lion sits in a threatened band in this atlas (resilience 27/100). Vulnerable. African numbers fell through the 20th century; Asiatic lions persist as a single-forest relic in Gir.

Teaching snapshot as of September 2026 — not a live IUCN feed.

Safeguards

Listing and enforcement

CITES, ESA, RFMOs and national parks only work when patrols and papers move.

Site protection

A breeding lake, ice type or cavity tree cannot be replaced by a logo.

Prey and forage base

Seals, krill, ungulates, bamboo and sardines are the quiet half of the lion budget.

Disease and toxin watch

Ebola, KHV, TTX, lead and rodenticides are type-specific ceilings.

English-language science capacity

The field sites in the techDeep lens still train the next census -- they are a safeguard only if funded.

What monitoring automates first

Census and acoustics

Camera traps, radar and moorings already take hours that used to be only notebooks.

Trade-document checks

eBCD and permit databases can flag a loin or a skin faster than a paper file.

Outbreak mapping

Flu and Ebola desks now run on shared dashboards -- still needing a human closer.

Visitor flow

Ticketing and hide cameras can be scheduled; habituation ethics cannot be fully automated.

Structural shifts

Climate as habitat law

Ice, bleach and river heat are now listing factors, not background weather.

From fortress to corridor

National parks plus gene flow -- panda belts, tiger landscapes, wolf packs on roads.

Fame as a take risk

Nemo, Jaws, Koko and Cecil still move capture, fear and donations in the same year.

English science is not the range

The localLens is a reading aid. Range-state languages still hold the living animal.

Outlook

Near term

Expect more listings, more cameras and more conflict paperwork -- not a sudden best-species ending.

Medium term

Sites that keep forage and enforcement will hold; single-lake and single-forest types stay brittle.

Long view

The lion body plan will remain recognisable. The map of secure versus threatened populations will not.

Keep exploring

More in Wildlife